Contents
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
.
|
Briganti A, Fossati N, Catto JWF, Cornford P, Montorsi F, Mottet
N, Wirth M, Van Poppel H.
Active Surveillance for
Low-risk Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology
Position in 2018.
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun 21. pii:
S0302-2838(18)30433-0. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.008. [Epub
ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Caliskan
S, Keles MO, Kaba S, Koca O, Akyuz M, Ozturk MI, Karaman MI.
Active
surveillance or radical prostatectomy? Which treatment is best?
Bratisl
Lek Listy. 2016;117(8):468-71. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
de
Carvalho TM, Heijnsdijk EAM, de Koning HJ.
When
should active surveillance for prostate cancer stop if no
progression is detected?
Prostate.
2017 Apr 17. doi: 10.1002/pros.23352. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Ehdaie
B.
Active
surveillance for prostate cancer: is it too active?
BJU
Int. 2016 Sep;118(3):343. doi: 10.1111/bju.13473.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Herden J, Weissbach L.
Utilization of Active Surveillance
and Watchful Waiting for localized prostate cancer in the daily
practice.
World J Urol. 2018 Jan 12. doi:
10.1007/s00345-018-2175-0. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Garisto
JD, Klotz L.
Active
Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: How to Do It Right.
Oncology
(Williston Park). 2017 May 15;31(5):333-40, 345.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz L.
Contemporary approach to active surveillance for
favorable risk prostate cancer.
Asian J Urol. 2019
Apr;6(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec
15.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz L.
Contemporary Active Surveillance: Candidate
Selection, Follow-up Tools, and Expected Outcomes.
Urol
Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;44(4):565-574. doi:
10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.005.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz L.
Active
surveillance for prostate cancer: overview and update.
Curr
Treat Options Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(1):97-108. doi:
10.1007/s11864-012-0221-5. First Online: 15 January 2013.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz
L (ed).
Active
Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer: A New Paradigm for
Clinical Management.
Humana
Press, 2012 (Book, 208 pages)
Source
|
Abstract
|
Full
text
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz L,
Zhang L, Lam A, Nam R, Mamedov A, Loblaw A.
Clinical
results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance
cohort with localized prostate cancer.
J
Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi:
10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
|
Lam TBL, MacLennan S, Willemse PM, Mason MD, Plass K, Shepherd R,
Baanders R, Bangma CH, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briers E, Briganti A,
Buddingh KT, Catto JWF, Colecchia M, Cox BW, Cumberbatch MG,
Davies J, Davis NF, De Santis M, Dell'Oglio P, Deschamps A,
Donaldson JF, Egawa S, Fankhauser CD, Fanti S, Fossati N,
Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Gross T, Grummet JP, Henry AM,
Ingels A, Irani J, Lardas M, Liew M, Lin DW, Moris L, Omar MI,
Pang KH, Paterson CC, Renard-Penna R, Ribal MJ, Roobol MJ, Rouprêt
M, Rouvière O, Sancho Pardo G, Richenberg J, Schoots IG,
Sedelaar JPM, Stricker P, Tilki D, Vahr Lauridsen S, van den Bergh
RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Kwast TH, van der Poel HG, van
Leenders GJLH, Varma M, Violette PD, Wallis CJD, Wiegel T,
Wilkinson K, Zattoni F, N'Dow JMO, Van Poppel H, Cornford P,
Mottet N.
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer
Guideline Panel Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment with
Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer from an
International Collaborative Study (DETECTIVE Study).
Eur
Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):790-813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.020.
Epub 2019 Oct 3.
Source
.
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Marenghi
C, Alvisi MF, Palorini F, Avuzzi B, Badenchini F, Bedini N,
Bellardita L, Biasoni D, Bosetti D, Casale A, Catanzaro M,
Colecchia M, De Luca L, Donegani S, Dordoni P, Lanocita R,
Maffezzini M, Magnani T, Menichetti J, Messina A, Morlino S,
Paolini B, Rancati T, Stagni S, Tesone A, Torelli T, Tulli Baldoin
E, Vaiani M, Villa S, Villa S, Zaffaroni N, Nicolai N, Salvioni R,
Valdagni R.
Eleven-year
management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance:
what have we learned?
Tumori.
2017 Jun 14:0. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Matulewicz RS, Weiner AB, Schaeffer EM.
Active
Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
JAMA. 2017 Dec
5;318(21):2152. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17222.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Nyame
YA, Almassi N, Haywood SC, Greene DJ, Ganesan V, Dai C, Zabell J,
Reichard C, Arora H, Zampini A, Crane A, Hettel D, Elshafei A,
Fareed K, Stein RJ, Berglund RK, Gong M, Jones JS, Klein EA,
Stephenson AJ.
Intermediate-Term
Outcomes for Men with Very Low/Low and Intermediate/High Risk
Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance.
J
Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):591-599. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.123.
Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Stöckle
M.
[Is
there still a role for active surveillance in prostate cancer?]
Urologe.
2017 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00120-017-0412-6. [Epub ahead of print]
[Article
in German]
Source
|
English
abstract |
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Syed
JS, Javier-Desloges J, Tatzel S, Bhagat A, Nguyen KA, Hwang K, Kim
S, Sprenkle PC.
Current
Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.
Curr
Oncol Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0569-6.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Witherspoon L, Breau RH, Lavallée LT.
Evidence-based
approach to active surveillance of prostate cancer.
World
J Urol. 2019 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02662-5. [Epub ahead
of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Xia
J, Trock BJ, Cooperberg MR, Gulati R, Zeliadt SB, Gore JL, Lin DW,
Carroll PR, Carter HB, Etzioni R.
Prostate
cancer mortality following active surveillance versus immediate
radical prostatectomy.
Clin
Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5471-8. doi:
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1502. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
LOW-RISK
(OR FAVORABLE-RISK) PROSTATE CANCER
|
|
.
|
D'Amico
AV.
Personalizing
the Use of Active Surveillance As an Initial Approach for Men With
Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.
J
Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3365-6. doi:
10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6118. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz
L.
Active
surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Curr
Opin Urol. 2017 Mar 4. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000393.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz
L.
Active
surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Curr
Urol Rep. 2015 Apr;16(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0492-z. Epub
2015 March 13.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Tosoian
JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Wolf S, Trock BJ, Carter
HB.
Intermediate
and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance
Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.
J
Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3379-85. doi:
10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5764. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Tosoian
JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P, Feng Z, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Walsh PC,
Carter HB.
Active
surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns
Hopkins experience.
J
Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2185-90. doi:
10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
MULTIPARAMETRIC
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE TO CONFIRM ELIGIBILITY
|
|
.
|
Galgano SJ, Glaser ZA, Porter KK, Rais-Bahrami S.
Role of
Prostate MRI in the Setting of Active Surveillance for Prostate
Cancer.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1096:49-67. doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-99286-0_3. First Online: 16 October 2018
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Luzzago S, Musi G, Catellani M, Russo A, Di Trapani E, Mistretta
FA, Bianchi R, Cozzi G, Conti A, Pricolo P, Ferro M, Matei DV,
Mirone V, Petralia G, de Cobelli O.
Multiparametric
Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active
Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate
Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active
Surveillance Protocol.
Urol Int. 2018 May 7:1-9. doi:
10.1159/000488772. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
IS AS
AN APPROPRIATE APPROACH FOR 3+3?
|
|
.
|
Ghiasy S, Abedi AR, Moradi A, Hosseini SY, Karkan MF, Sadri G,
Davari M.
Is active surveillance an appropriate approach
to manage prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 3+3 who met
the criteria for active surveillance?
Turk J Urol. 2018
Nov 19:1-4. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.72920. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
INTERMEDIATE-RISK
PROSTATE CANCER
|
|
.
|
Butler SS, Mahal BA, Lamba N, Mossanen M, Martin NE, Mouw KW,
Nguyen PL, Muralidhar V.
Use and early mortality outcomes
of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate
cancer.
Cancer. 2019 May 31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32202.
[Epub ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
|
Klotz L.
Active surveillance in intermediate risk
prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2019 Oct 24. doi:
10.1111/bju.14935. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
.
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Klotz
L.
Active
Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Curr
Urol Rep. 2017 Aug 11;18(10):80. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0726-3.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Masic
S, Washington SL 3rd, Carroll PR.
Management
of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance:
never or sometimes?
Curr
Opin Urol. 2017 May;27(3):231-237. doi:
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000387. Epub 2017 May 1.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
Gleason
grade 3 + 4 = 7
|
|
.
|
Bhat A, Punnen S.
Point: Should Active Surveillance Be
Used for Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer?
Oncology
(Williston Park). 2019 Jun 19;33(6):235-6.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Madueke I, Abern MR.
Counterpoint: Should Active
Surveillance Be Used for Gleason 3+4 Prostate Cancer?
Oncology
(Williston Park). 2019 Jun 19;33(6):235, 237-8, 242.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
**
|
Park J, Yoo S, Cho MC, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Jeong H.
Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 3 + 4 Are Not
Appropriate Candidates for Active Surveillance.
Urol
Int. 2019 Nov 6:1-6. doi: 10.1159/000503888. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
.
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Shangguan
X, Dong B, Wang Y, Xu F, Shao X, Sha J, Zhu Y, Pan J, Xue W.
Management
of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic
features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active
surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.
J
Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
Favorable
intermediate-risk prostate cancer
|
|
.
|
Dall'Era
MA, Klotz L.
Active
surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Prostate
Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Nov 1. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.51. [Epub
ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Du
C, Chen H, Li C.
Re:
Alessandro Morlacco, John C. Cheville, Laureano J. Rangel, Derek
J. Gearman, R. Jeffrey Karnes. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason
Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-risk" Prostate
Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance. Eur Urol. In press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.043.
Eur
Urol. 2017 Feb 3. pii: S0302-2838(17)30065-9. doi:
10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.040. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Gandaglia
G, Briganti A, Montorsi F.
Re:
Risk Group
and
Death From
Prostate Cancer: Implications for
Active Surveillance in
Men with
Favorable Intermediate-risk
Prostate
Cancer.
Eur
Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):370. doi:
10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.059.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Morlacco
A, Cheville JC, Rangel LJ, Gearman DJ, Jeffrey Karnes R.
Adverse
Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable
Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active
Surveillance.
Eur
Urol. 2016 Aug 28. pii: S0302-2838(16)30511-5. doi:
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.043. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Musunuru
HB, Yamamoto T, Klotz L, Ghanem G, Mamedov A, Sethukavalan P,
Jethava V, Jain S, Zhang L, Vesprini D, Loblaw A.
Active
Surveillance in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival
Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience.
J
Urol. 2016 Aug 26. pii: S0022-5347(16)31142-9. doi:
10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.102. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Raldow
AC, Zhang D, Chen MH, Braccioforte MH, Moran BJ, D'Amico AV.
Risk
Group
and
Death From
Prostate Cancer: Implications for
Active Surveillance in
Men With
Favorable Intermediate-Risk
Prostate
Cancer.
JAMA
Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):334-40. doi:
10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.284.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Saad
F.
Active
Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: How Far Should We Go?
JAMA
Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):340-1. doi:
10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.103.
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
ACTIVE
SURVEILLANCE IN YOUNGER MEN
|
|
.
|
Leapman
MS, Cowan JE, Nguyen HG, Shinohara KK, Perez N, Cooperberg MR,
Catalona WJ, Carroll PR.
Active
Surveillance in Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.
J
Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 27:JCO2016680058. doi:
10.1200/JCO.2016.68.0058. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
|
Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
Super-active
surveillance
|
|
.
|
Bloom JB, Gold SA, Hale GR, Rayn KN, Sabarwal VK, Bakhutashvili I,
Valera V, Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Wood BJ.
"Super-active
surveillance": MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy and ablation for
less invasive management of prostate cancer.
Gland Surg.
2018 Apr;7(2):166-187. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.03.06.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Ghodoussipour S, Lebastchi AH, Bloom JB, Pinto PA, Berger A.
Super active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer |
Opinion: No.
Int Braz J Urol. 2019
Mar-Apr;45(2):215-219. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.02.03.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Reis LO, Andrade DL, Bianco FJ Jr.
Super active
surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer | Opinion: Yes.
Int
Braz J Urol. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):210-214. doi:
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.02.02. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
MUTATION
STATUS OF BRCA1/2 AND ATM CAN HELP INFORM DECISIONS BETWEEN AS AND
CURATIVE INTERVENTION
|
|
.
|
Carter HB, Helfand B, Mamawala M, Wu Y, Landis P, Yu H, Wiley K,
Na R, Shi Z, Petkewicz J, Shah S, Fantus RJ, Novakovic K, Brendler
CB, Zheng SL, Isaacs WB, Xu J.
Germline Mutations in ATM
and BRCA1/2 Are Associated with Grade Reclassification in Men on
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol. 2018
Oct 8. pii: S0302-2838(18)30684-5. doi:
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.021. [Epub ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
.
|
Roobol MJ.
Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate
Cancer: Will it Become Obsolete?
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct 25.
pii: S0302-2838(18)30809-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.021.
[Epub ahead of print]
Editorial
relating to:
Carter HB et al, Germline Mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 Are
Associated with Grade Reclassification in Men on Active
Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct 8. pii:
S0302-2838(18)30684-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.021. [Epub
ahead of print]
Source
| Full
text |
Similar
articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|